« April 14, 2006 | Main | April 17, 2006 »

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994) Review

I recall watching this on TNT (I think it was TNT) when released and thinking that it was pretty good. I don't think I had seen it since. I'm glad that we watched it again, because it really is quite an excellent telling of the tale. Even Kenneth Branagh, who I don't really like, fit perfectly. Normally I find him just a little too self-absorbed. In this case, that's exactly what was needed. He directed as well, and did a fine job.

Meanwhile, the always excellent Robert de Niro ably filled the body of the creature and actually gave the role some life. Uh, so to speak.

For those who aren't familiar with the tale, Victor Frankenstein has gone to university to study medicine, only to become obsessed with bestowing life on dead tissue, because his own mother died in childbirth. Unfortunately his own brilliance becomes his downfall, as he spirals into the world of his own making, and when he does create this life, it is to see his own life fall apart around him.

Remember the Titans (2000) Review

Though perhaps not the best movie ever, this Denzel Washington vehicle is certainly a good movie to watch on a lazy weekend afternoon when you're surfing the channels looking for something to pass the afternoon.

The story centers around a small school that's suddenly been given a surprise for the new school year - they will be joining together with a black school, and in even more of a surprise, the head coach of the black school will become the head coach of the football team. Needless to say, this doesn't go over well.

The Sting (1973) Review

This classic starring Paul Newman and Robert Redford is one of the greats. At this writing, it sits at #82 on the IMDB Top 250 List (an accomplishment in itself), but moreover it's one of those movies that stands the test of time.

Perhaps part of the reason is that the movie is set in 1930 - so the fact that it was released in 1973 isn't as much of an issue as some other more recent movies. It's still going to seem dated. Perhaps more importantly, the storyline isn't so dependent on money (though some of the sums certainly seem less and less significant each time I see the film) as it is just a good caper.

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994) Review

I recall watching this on TNT (I think it was TNT) when released and thinking that it was pretty good. I don't think I had seen it since. I'm glad that we watched it again, because it really is quite an excellent telling of the tale. Even Kenneth Branagh, who I don't really like, fit perfectly. Normally I find him just a little too self-absorbed. In this case, that's exactly what was needed. He directed as well, and did a fine job.

Meanwhile, the always excellent Robert de Niro ably filled the body of the creature and actually gave the role some life. Uh, so to speak.

For those who aren't familiar with the tale, Victor Frankenstein has gone to university to study medicine, only to become obsessed with bestowing life on dead tissue, because his own mother died in childbirth. Unfortunately his own brilliance becomes his downfall, as he spirals into the world of his own making, and when he does create this life, it is to see his own life fall apart around him.

Remember the Titans (2000) Review

Though perhaps not the best movie ever, this Denzel Washington vehicle is certainly a good movie to watch on a lazy weekend afternoon when you're surfing the channels looking for something to pass the afternoon.

The story centers around a small school that's suddenly been given a surprise for the new school year - they will be joining together with a black school, and in even more of a surprise, the head coach of the black school will become the head coach of the football team. Needless to say, this doesn't go over well.

The Sting (1973) Review

This classic starring Paul Newman and Robert Redford is one of the greats. At this writing, it sits at #82 on the IMDB Top 250 List (an accomplishment in itself), but moreover it's one of those movies that stands the test of time.

Perhaps part of the reason is that the movie is set in 1930 - so the fact that it was released in 1973 isn't as much of an issue as some other more recent movies. It's still going to seem dated. Perhaps more importantly, the storyline isn't so dependent on money (though some of the sums certainly seem less and less significant each time I see the film) as it is just a good caper.

About Celluloid Heroes

Welcome to Celluloid Heroes! Here you will find movie reviews of all shapes and sizes. No stone is left unturned, and that is meant quite literally. In fact, you are probably quite unlikely to find the best of the best, as that's something that you can find elsewhere. Here you're more likely to find the dregs of the movie world than anything else.

As to the name? It's actually from a song by The Kinks, and while it may or may not have something directly to do with movies, it does mention quite a few movie stars and things that make you think about movies, and well, it just seemed appropriate. Hopefully you'll agree, and if not, I suspect it won't get in the way too much.

Thanks for visiting, enjoy your stay, and come back often..